Tuesday, April 24, 2012

GAD Disorder

I am Generalized Anxiety Disorder classified as GAD. I worry excessively over things that might not even happen. I worry about all things pertaining to my life and do not have just one phobia. I have a difficulty relaxing and often am fatigued, irritable, and tense. I often cannot sleep and my muscles are tight. I cannot cope with stress. My fear and worry are uncontrollable and disrupt my every day life. I am a mentally and physically draining disorder.

Monday, April 16, 2012

My Personality Test Results

Today as we learned about different theories of personality, I took two personality tests to see how accurate they seemed to represent myself. The first test results claimed I have some "personality weakness" but I am "able to compensate for them." The results did not mention what the weaknesses were directly but said that I am diciplined and controlled on the outside but worriesome on the inside. I agree with the fact that I am an independent thinker and that I have a desire for approval. I also agree with the fact that I tend to be critical of myself but disagree with the suggestion that said I was insecure. The second test I took came from http://test.personality-project.org/survey/yourscores.php?G=2&Y=17&A=5.7&O=4&E=3.7&S=3.2&C=3.6&M=1&CI=12&Q=4. This test said that my highest rating was in the category of agreeableness where I scored in the 92 percentile. Agreeable people have an optimistic view of human nature and believe people are honest, decent, and trustworthy. In the categories of openness, emotional stability, and conscientiousness were all average. I believe these tests were pretty decent indicators of my personality. There were a few points made in the analysis that I did not agree with but overall I believe the questions were straight-forward and the results were pretty accurate.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Evolution of Nonverbal Emotion

pekmanPaul Eckman has made a considerable contribution to the psychological world. He earned his Ph. D. in clincal psychology from Adelphi University in 1958. His credited work comes from his research in facial and body expressions, also classified as nonverbal communication. The hit show Lie To Me was based off of his work and findings. His work teaches how to detect micro-expressions, or brief, split-second facial movements that detect emotions and lieing ability. A question that arises from his work revolves around the idea that nonverbal emotion can be explained by evolution. http://www.nonverbal-world.com/2010/10/letstry-to-understand-that-how-non.html ---> This article explains that nonverbal communication came about through evolution of survival skills. According to this article the ability to sense and react to sounds, smells, gestures, and postures are part of vital nonverbal communication for survival. The article goes on to explain emotion as “a pre-defined survival strategy or intention of reacting to environment or entities. Through emotions, animals have learned to attract mates, know when danger is present, and develop a sense of belonging in the habitat of which they belong. Nonverbal emotion created a basis for survival and then evolved into a communication network used today.

Monday, April 2, 2012

Culture& Intelligence Reflection

  I believe that culure can play a large part in determining intelligence; but it doesn't have to. After reading the You Can't High Jump If the Bar Is Set Low article, I believe that by allowing kids to settle into racial stereotypes, you are an aid to their failure or lack of success. By stating what people think they know about other people's scores i.e. a man's score on a math test, a woman might not have as much drive to do better, thinking that she won't match up to a male taking the same test. The same situation can be applied to various racial groups as discussed in the article. A Study was conducted to see if sterotypes actually do play an important role in the success of students on various tests and the results concluded that by not stating stereotypic results before taking the test, racial minorities and females scored better than their counterparts who heard the stereotypes not in their favor. Steele, the psychologist who conducted the study set up a program at the University of Michigan gathered a random sampling of well-off and economically challeged students and held them to a high acedemic standard. These students did exceptionally well. The top two-thirds of the black students were as successful as their white peers. Compared to a control group of black students who took the "typical" path in college and accepted the stereotypes were not successful.  Steele's brother Shelby contradicted him and claimed that black students who do not do well suffer from "internalized" inferiority. He claims that students who face stereotypes should work harder and not cling to their status as a victim.

I think that exposure to different experiences and life situations (culture) plays an important role on the type of intelligence people have. I know that if I was told a boy would typically score better on a test, I would try really hard to score the same, if not better than the boy; yet I wouldn't hold myself accountable for a lower score, blaming my intelligence on my gender---which is a flaw in my thought process. I think that if teachers and professors hold everyone accountable to reach their fullest potential and knowledge regardless of statistics and stereotypes, there would be more success and less failure.