GAD Disorder

I am Generalized Anxiety Disorder classified as GAD. I worry excessively over things that might not even happen. I worry about all things pertaining to my life and do not have just one phobia. I have a difficulty relaxing and often am fatigued, irritable, and tense. I often cannot sleep and my muscles are tight. I cannot cope with stress. My fear and worry are uncontrollable and disrupt my every day life. I am a mentally and physically draining disorder.

My Personality Test Results

Today as we learned about different theories of personality, I took two personality tests to see how accurate they seemed to represent myself. The first test results claimed I have some "personality weakness" but I am "able to compensate for them." The results did not mention what the weaknesses were directly but said that I am diciplined and controlled on the outside but worriesome on the inside. I agree with the fact that I am an independent thinker and that I have a desire for approval. I also agree with the fact that I tend to be critical of myself but disagree with the suggestion that said I was insecure. The second test I took came from http://test.personality-project.org/survey/yourscores.php?G=2&Y=17&A=5.7&O=4&E=3.7&S=3.2&C=3.6&M=1&CI=12&Q=4. This test said that my highest rating was in the category of agreeableness where I scored in the 92 percentile. Agreeable people have an optimistic view of human nature and believe people are honest, decent, and trustworthy. In the categories of openness, emotional stability, and conscientiousness were all average. I believe these tests were pretty decent indicators of my personality. There were a few points made in the analysis that I did not agree with but overall I believe the questions were straight-forward and the results were pretty accurate.

Evolution of Nonverbal Emotion

Paul Eckman has made a considerable contribution to the psychological world. He earned his Ph. D. in clincal psychology from Adelphi University in 1958. His credited work comes from his research in facial and body expressions, also classified as nonverbal communication. The hit show Lie To Me was based off of his work and findings. His work teaches how to detect micro-expressions, or brief, split-second facial movements that detect emotions and lieing ability. A question that arises from his work revolves around the idea that nonverbal emotion can be explained by evolution. http://www.nonverbal-world.com/2010/10/letstry-to-understand-that-how-non.html ---> This article explains that nonverbal communication came about through evolution of survival skills. According to this article the ability to sense and react to sounds, smells, gestures, and postures are part of vital nonverbal communication for survival. The article goes on to explain emotion as “a pre-defined survival strategy or intention of reacting to environment or entities”. Through emotions, animals have learned to attract mates, know when danger is present, and develop a sense of belonging in the habitat of which they belong. Nonverbal emotion created a basis for survival and then evolved into a communication network used today.

Culture& Intelligence Reflection

  I believe that culure can play a large part in determining intelligence; but it doesn't have to. After reading the You Can't High Jump If the Bar Is Set Low article, I believe that by allowing kids to settle into racial stereotypes, you are an aid to their failure or lack of success. By stating what people think they know about other people's scores i.e. a man's score on a math test, a woman might not have as much drive to do better, thinking that she won't match up to a male taking the same test. The same situation can be applied to various racial groups as discussed in the article. A Study was conducted to see if sterotypes actually do play an important role in the success of students on various tests and the results concluded that by not stating stereotypic results before taking the test, racial minorities and females scored better than their counterparts who heard the stereotypes not in their favor. Steele, the psychologist who conducted the study set up a program at the University of Michigan gathered a random sampling of well-off and economically challeged students and held them to a high acedemic standard. These students did exceptionally well. The top two-thirds of the black students were as successful as their white peers. Compared to a control group of black students who took the "typical" path in college and accepted the stereotypes were not successful.  Steele's brother Shelby contradicted him and claimed that black students who do not do well suffer from "internalized" inferiority. He claims that students who face stereotypes should work harder and not cling to their status as a victim.

I think that exposure to different experiences and life situations (culture) plays an important role on the type of intelligence people have. I know that if I was told a boy would typically score better on a test, I would try really hard to score the same, if not better than the boy; yet I wouldn't hold myself accountable for a lower score, blaming my intelligence on my gender---which is a flaw in my thought process. I think that if teachers and professors hold everyone accountable to reach their fullest potential and knowledge regardless of statistics and stereotypes, there would be more success and less failure.

Forgetfulness

I feel as though my memory is not up to par but I learned that most information is forgotten within the first day of learning it. There are five key reasons why we as humans forget information. We could have encoding failure where our short-term memory does not encode information into long-term memory. Our memory can decay over time and our memories can degrade. We could have retrieval failure where our long-term memories are inaccessible. This is called the tip of the tongue phenomenon. (i.e. seeing someone's face but forgetting their name but you have a feeling that you know it) There is aslo a theory about motivated forgetting. We as people are motivated to forget painful, threatening, or embarassing memories. In class my group did a project to sense which is remembered more; a slideshow with pictures, or tangible objects one could feel. Our conclusion was that kids were close to half-and-half for each but more students remembered the objects they could feel. Each alternated between getting the movie first or the tangible objects first. This experiment could also be used to test proactive interference (old information interfering with new information) and retroactive interference (new innformation interfering with old information). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7isjhz1GpHg is a video of four ap psych students rapping about memory. Everyone learns and remembers in different ways and if song is a way that works for you, here you go!

Memory

Memory is something that everyone wants to maintain throughout their lifetime. Growing up paretns like to play the game "Memory" with their children to enhance memory skills young. I was never very good at this game though I felt as if I tried just as hard as other kids to remember where the matches were. This week in psych I think we explained why. I learned that memory can be affected by different factors and that people have short-term and long-term memory. I learned that some memories are automatic while others are take effort. Reading for understanding takes effort as does remembering where a handful of cards in a Memory game are. I learned that immediate,  brief, recordings are stored in sensory memory which is a temporary state. We then process information into a short-term memory where we encode through rehearsal. i.e. finding a memory card twice in the same spot after a turn has passed. Information goes into our long-term memory by experiences and connections that can be processed later. However, stages can be modified. Working memory is a second stage modification that picks-and-chooses what attention is drawn to in incoming stimuli and processes what it senses. I believe my problem as a child occured between my sensory memory and my working memory. According to http://www.apa.org/monitor/sep05/workout.aspx "In fact, working memory could be the basis for general intelligence and reasoning: Those who can hold many items in their mind may be well equipped to consider different angles of a complex problem simultaneously." I do not think I had a very good working memory because I found myself getting distracted from the game and my "pick-n-choose" method did not pick up the right information and therefore my memory of where i had chosen cards and what cards I chose did not implant itself in my mind.

Classical Conditioning

Ivan Pavlov was famous for hs classical conditioning experiements with learning and behaviorism. He noticed that when a dog was given food, the dog would salivate. To test learning ability, Pavlov paired feeding a dog wih a sound tone. After some time, the dog started salivating when he heard the sound tone. Pavlov's experiment lead him to create variables relating to the stimuli and responses he observed.  The natural reaction for the dog when given food was to salivate. Pavlov identifed this and called the response an unconditioned response (UR). The food given was the stimulus that triggered the salivating response so the food was called the unconditioned stimulus (US). Once the dog learned that a sound tone triggered food, the dog began salivating once the noise was heard. The learned response to the noise was called a conditioned response (CR). The tone was the learned and controlled stimulus that triggered a response and was called the conditioned stimulus (CS). Through Pavlov's work, many physchologists have realized that a process such as learning can be studied objectively. This site compares classical conditioning with operant conditioning with given examples. Operant conditioning is learning through consequences. One associates their own actions with positive and negative consequences, striving to recieve positive consequences. Try to see if you can distinguish between the two types of learning in the site listed below.


http://www.utexas.edu/courses/svinicki/ald320/CCOC.html

AP PSA Announcement

My favorite PSA was done by Tyler, Corry and Nick. I enjoyed their video because besides being entertaining, it was informative and incorporated outside sources such as a movie clip to display their information. The clip clearly explained programs to enhance the years during adolescence and old age. They were charismatic and traveled to different places around Ashwaubenon to show real places that provide learning programs to grow. I more clearly understood the concrete opperational stage after watching thier PSA. I could understand their voices in the video and they kept their information light and to the point.

Challenging Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development

Jean Piaget is known for his psychological work with cognitive development throughout the years of a person's life. Today in class Mrs. VanStraten (Mrs. Wollersheim's mother, I apologize for the spelling) came to class and gave us a kindergarden lesson with shapes. We used Piaget's concepts of schemas, assimilaion, and accomodation to sort and find similarities between various sizes and colors of shapes. We knew that round shapes were considered circles. (schema) We then went on to assimilate that squares can still be squares dispite size differences and further accomodated that squares and rectangles both share four sides, but rectangles have two longer sides than squares do thus showing the difference between shapes.

The lesson was very interesting because I realized the way that Mrs. Van Straten taught us shapes must have been very similar to the way I learned to differenciate a circle from a square. To test Piaget's stages of cognitive development I put his theories to the test on the two children I baby-sit. Maxx is a five-year-old pre-kindergarden student and Maddy is an eight-year-old in second grade. According to Piaget, Maxx would fall into the preoperational stage while Maddy would be in the concrete opperational stage. To test Piaget's theories I asked Maxx and Maddy at different times to identify the shapes and colors of the rectangles, squares, triangles and circles. Maxx knew the difference between the colors and shapes but did not take much more interest in them. When Maddy came home from school I asked her to identify the shapes as well and she knew them all easily. When I asked the kids to pick up the shapes, Maxx started picking up all of the shapes with no particular order or method while Maddy sorted each of the shapes by shape, size, and color. I found that Maddy took a logical approach in sorting the shapes in a sequence that made sense to her while Maxx did not come up with a system to put the shapes together. I believe that Piaget's development stages conicide with the ages of each developmental group. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw33CBsEmR4&feature=related explains Piaget's theories by going through each cognitive stage. Maxx's preoperational stage portrays his lack of concrete logic and egocentrism while Maddy being in the concrete operational stage is able to understand chage and can think logically think through math proplems and sequences.

Ice Cube Addiction

       This week pretending to have a drug addiction (with ice cubes) was more difficult than I thought. Putting ice cubes in some drinks were more socially acceptable than others.( i.e. water versus tea) I believe this relates to social situations as well. People who have drug addictions tend to hang around other people with drug addictions because exposing your addiction isn't as socially unacceptable to people who also have the addiction. It was not only hard hiding the addiction, it was also hard keeping the addiction. Not being able to access ice from school made pre-planning necessary. I believe people with addictions also come to stress when their drugs are not on hand. I was able to lie to my parents when I recieved wierd looks for putting ice in my milk and tea. They noticed I was acting differently and my mom even yelled at me for taking a water bottle to school. (She didn't know it was filled with ice.) I have a cold and my mom attributed the germs to the water bottle I brought to school and told me that I shouldn't bring it again. My parents did not assume I was on drugs because I did not have obvious signs of an addiction. Ice cubes are relatively simple and do not cause nearly the amount of effects drugs can cause. I liked the experiment because it was interesting how people would hide their bracelets and how people shared and traded ice cubes like street drugs. Drugs can be categorized as depressants, stimulants, and hallucigens. I believe ice cubes would fall under the stimulant category if given one because they make drinks cold and coldness sends a wake-up call to the brain. True drug addictions can cause permanant brain damage as well as depression, anxiety, and death. After learning the effects of drugs on the brain, I believe that if I would have any addiction, ice cubes would be the best bet.

Neurotransmitters Treating Violence?

     This week I came to terms with the complex messinging system of the body: the nervous system. The nervous system is split between the peripheral nervous system and the central nervous system. (The peripheral divides down into sub-groups) but the main focus of this blog is to address neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters are special chemical messages that travel accross the synapse to binding receptor sites to pass along messages to various body parts and the brain. There are many different types of neurotransmitters that affect different hormones and feelings ie. Serotonin. I stumbled accross the article http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/you-illuminated/201201/treating-violence-new-antidotes which talks about different drugs used to target neurotransmitters like GABA (an inhibitory neurotransmitter) to reduce the physical acts of violence on aggressive psyciatric patients.
   This article explains how drugs like Haldol and lithium have been around for a few decades and have been used to help lessen agressive patients but serious side effects such as loss in cognation have resulted. Now scientists are discovering which neurotransmitters to target with newly formed drugs to produce the same result in aggression, but provide a safer method to do it. We know that the neurotransmitter serotonin affects a person's mood and an undersupply can lead to depression and aggression. A medication called Zomig is used to lessen the effects of migranes. Zomig was also part of a study to see if it would be an acceptable drug to use in lessening feelings of aggression. By specifically targeting Serotonin 1B receptors, Zomig acts as an agonist and allows more Serotonin to be released causing positive feelings to arise. Zomig still needs clinical tests done to see any and all possible side effects but it can be a positive step forward in treating aggression. Psychology is universal and has many applications in medicine.

Psychological Perspectives Relating to the movie: What About Bob?

I do not think that either one of the perspectives alone would be enough to explain Bob's condition. A psychologist would have to be eclectic and use both perspectives with a case like Bob's.

I find the movie What About Bob to be fairly funny and entertaining. Besides being a comedy, this movie has a relavent scene to the psychological perspectives we learned in class. http://www.teachertube.com/viewVideo.php?title=Psych_20___05_Bob_Viewing_Assignment&video_id=78896 In this scene Bob Wiley admits to his therapist that he has "problems." (I apologize there are some inapropriate words bleeped out of the clip while Bob pretends to have turetts syndrome.)  He claims he has problems moving when he is out in public away from his apartment. He uses the term "wierd" to define his actions when he goes out. His "wierdness" that he describes are physical conditions such as hot and cold sweats, difficulty swollowing, and blurred vision. Bob's ultimate concern is that he is afraid of death. His "what if" scenarios throw Bob into a panic to where he believes that if he pretends to have certain medical conditions like turetts, then he knows that he doesn't have that condition so it is a sense of reassurance to him that he is safe. At the end of the clip the author asks which perspective explains Bob's behavior- the cognitive perspective or the behavioral perspective?

Through reading the first chapter and listening to the lecture in class, I learned that the cognitive perspective is defined by studying the thought process behind one's action. It is the way the brain works to account for one's thoughts or actions. I believe that the cognitive perspective would be a good way to explain his behavior. He believed that by faking an illness, he would know that he did not have it. I think by studying how his mind processes his fears would be beneficial to curing his fears. His brain processes uncomfort and disease different from a person who isn't afraid of becoming ill and by studying why his brain makes him think and act the way he does, would be beneficial to help him as well as others who suffer through the same thing.

On the other hand, the behavioral perspective also would be a great way to study and explain his behavior. Behaviorism is the focus of observable behavior of an individual dealing with their response to situations and consequences. By studying Bob's behavior, one may discover why he feels uncomfortable being social out of his apartment and his fear of getting sick. He may have become ill as a consequence of a contagious disease and now believes he is more susseptible to other illnesses. By studying his behavior in different settings could help explain why he acts uncomfortable and "wierd" as he describes himself.

Chapter One: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science

       Through reading the prologue and chapter one of the text, I gained a little background on the history of psychology and the different ways it can be interpreted. I learned that psychologists apply the scientific method to humans to figure out information on how we relate experiences or have feelings. Today's definition of psychology is the science of behavior and mental processes. The field's most debated question is nature versus nurture: are we who we are because of heredity? Or are we who we are because of other factors like our enviornment or how we are raised? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26wQgAfTwA4 is a video that explains how both heredity and enviornment play key roles in the development of a person. I wonder how twins seperated at birth would relate to each other once grown. Would they have similar mannerisms and behaviors? Or would they be more like strangers raised in different homes? The text says that biological, psychological and social-cultural influence our behavior. So therefore would the heredity and enviornment influence each child equally? Would the same sex twins act more similar than opposite sex twins? I hope to find out during this class. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15629096 This article is a real application of the twin question because it actually happened. Two twin girls were seperated at birth for a scientific study and reunited 35 years later. Interestingly, the adoptive families were told that the children they were adopting were part of a scientific study but refused to say what the study entailed. Peter Neubauer realized that the majority of the public would be against the study and did not publish the results. The study is sealed up in an envelope and cannot be evaluated until 2066. The twins claim to have similarites, but ultimately realize they are different people who were raised in different homes. After reading the ethics portion of the chapter I realized that Neubauer's experiement seems unethical. To seperate family members at birth without explaining the premise or reasoning is wrong. Part of the ethics of scientific study of humans is to "obtain the informed consent of potential participants and to protect them from harm and discomfort". I do not believe that Neubauer protected the women from harm once they realized they were twins. The article does note that this study will never be replicated.  **This is a picture of the two women seperated at birth.

AP Psych Expectations

My main expectation for this class is to gain an understanding on how the brain processes experiences and why we interpret things the way we do. I am interested in learning why we as humans remember and retain some information easier than other information. I am also interested in learning the differences between genders and how different experiences and feelings relate to each gender. My ultimate goal upon finishing the class is to score a three or higher on the AP exam. I expect this class to be more rigorous than some of my other classes. I know that it will be paced fairly quickly and that I will need to be able to retain information and take good notes.